Want to know what other Ender's Game fans think? Read all about it and post your own HERE!


Now that the final trailer for Ender’s Game has been released, armchair critics around the world are typing out their opinions on “the nets” with comments ranging from a simple, “SPOILERS” to “this movie looks amazing” to “this movie looks awful”.


For book fans, a common kneejerk reaction to the new trailer is the complaint that it’s made pretty clear that the major “twist” of the Ender’s Game book–that it’s all really happening–is not preserved for movie audiences. And yet, I’m sure we all can eventually realize that as long as the truth is hidden from Ender, the heart of the story is intact.

When I first saw the trailer at Comic Con, I tweeted about this audience perspective topic because it somehow surprised me. Since I think a lot about this movie adaptation, I’d known for a really long time that it was possible they’d open this part of the story up, but seeing it on the screen was still a bit of a shock. Now that I’ve actually had the chance to watch the trailer as many times as I’d like, the dust has settled and I’ve come to realize the amazing potential of such a decision by the filmmakers.

The most important thing to realize right from the start is that Ender’s Game is a film adaptation. A book is a book and a movie is a movie. I know we book fanatics can sometimes be so stuck to the pages of a novel that we can’t see the painfully obvious–that impactful scenes in books can translate into awfully dull scenes in movies.

Mind you, this is not a criticism of Card’s book. I obviously wouldn’t have started this site and invested so much into it if I didn’t truly love the book he wrote. They’re simply different mediums. Let’s look at Eros. The environment Card put Ender in worked exceptionally well for an individual holed up somewhere with their nose in a book because let’s face it, we all read alone.

We feel isolated in some way when we sink into the world of a story and that’s probably part of the reason why we felt a kind of relationship with Ender Wiggin. You felt alone with Ender Wiggin in that isolated simulator room with Mazer Rackham breathing over his (and your) shoulders. You can immerse yourself into his situation and for some people this creates tunnel vision, which is what makes the final reveal of the twist so jarring.

Movies, however, are an entirely different experience. Rather than relying on imagination, movies depend entirely on visual appeal, sound effects, and performances. Movies must also present a much broader picture in much less time, which becomes a crutch for telling such a complex story as Ender’s.

The reason so many of us are so attached to the story of Ender is that it made us think. After it was over, there was so much to talk about and contemplate regarding morals and ethics, which is probably why it’s taught in so many schools.

Books have the luxury of having pages and pages to explain the complexities of plot, but to preserve his twist, Card doesn’t actually do this during Ender’s “gaming”. He left the explanations for the post-war section of the book. The movie could do the same, but the flow would be interrupted because people would have to think back to what he did. With prior knowledge of what the teachers are hiding from Ender, audiences are set up for a bigger emotional investment for when Ender finally learns the truth.  This isn’t The Sixth Sense, nor does it have to be.


Revealing the real “game” the teachers are playing also gives us a much better look into the characters of Graff and Mazer, who are, let’s face it, marquis players in this movie’s cast. Hiding it actually seems like wasted potential for the film. By expanding upon the teachers’ moral dilemma over Ender, their characters become more complex and therefore more interesting rather than being straightforward domineering superiors.

We’ve seen only a few seconds of Graff in the trailers and a lot of it could be taken out of context, but I’m liking what I’m seeing so far. One of our readers on Facebook said that he doesn’t like how they’ve been portraying Graff, that he’s much too hardass and not the Graff he loves. I have to respectfully disagree because the brief glimpses of Graff that I’ve seen are to me true to the heart of his character.

While the book-Graff we know clearly cares for Ender, what has always made him compelling is the fact that he knows enough about what’s at stake and sets his sights on the end goal, which is the safety of the human race. He is the cornerstone for the conversations people have about this story. Do the ends justify the means? Is what they did to one boy “excusable” in order to save billions? And while Graff in the trailer does sound cold and jaded, this is the steely determined Graff that molds Ender into who he is. Without his drive, Ender may not have succeeded.

The conflicts between Graff/Mazer and Graff/Anderson would serve to highlight these issues and with audiences aware of the true nature of the destruction that Ender is causing, it ultimately makes for a much more powerful finale. In short, the emotional impact of the movie shouldn’t be that you didn’t realize what was going on. The impact should be with Ender’s realization that what you’ve just watched with the same horror as Graff and Mazer was, in fact, not a game.

"He's in command, there's no stopping him now."

“He’s in command, there’s no stopping him now.”

Regarding the complaint that the trailer shows the movie’s twist, it’s really all in how you look at it. There technically is no audience twist like with the book. Instead, there’s only Ender’s twist. With the look on Graff’s face, you can imagine all his fears, his hopes, his regrets, and his sorrow. He looks as though in this moment, he finally realizes the scope of the “weapon” he’s created in Ender. And yet, the true horror he has to face is yet to come when he has to face Ender and tell him the truth. This will be the movie’s heart. And it’s not in the trailer.

I could be wrong. Perhaps the trailer has been very cleverly edited and I only think I know what they’re saying because I’ve read the book. But movies have a different level of power when it comes to evoking emotion. Gavin Hood has talked about putting pages of thinking and emotion into a single look on screen and I think that’s indicative of his own awareness of the importance of the ending.

Last December, I wrote a piece in which I talked about what Ender’s Game ultimately needs to accomplish. I said that what mattered most was that audiences realize what they’ve done to Ender and I think at that time, I thought that it rested solely on Asa Butterfield’s performance immediately following the final battle.

I can see now that the setup for that scene will be a key factor in making that performance truly successful. With that setup, his performance would be given so much more weight. And so, I want audiences to know. I want audiences to feel and despair over Ender’s actions so that when he’s finally aware, every little part of that scene clicks into place. To make people feel what I and so many of you felt when we first journeyed with Ender Wiggin would be an amazing accomplishment and a rounding success for Gavin Hood and his cast and crew.


  1. Ludwig Scroggins IV says:

    My annoyance isn’t really that they hint at it not being a game. It’s that they blatantly shove in your face exactly how he beats the test. Like, it’s pretty obvious. They show it in detail in the trailer. So, when that moment arrives, those who don’t already know will be like, “oh I know what’s going to happen here!” Tension totally dissolved. Thanks, trailer makers!

    • I actually don’t think this is what we think it is anymore. I mean I assumed that’s what it was too, but if you look at screenshots, he’s actually shooting through an asteroid field, behind which there are the ships he must face. Then there’s the very start of trailer two with the long ship barreling through in a downward motion, as if plummeting to the surface of a planet, which is how they detonate dr device according to ES. I put this in our trailer evaluation which we haven’t finished yet, hopefully soon!

      • Ludwig Scroggins IV says:

        I think the first shot is definitely from the final battle. you may be right about the others at the end.

        I have a really important question, one that this new trailer brings up: It seems that either the Buggers are now invading for a third time, or the IF is lying to the students to make them think this.

        Either way, how are the simulations supposed to handle this, since if they are invading us, we wouldn’t be facing them at their homeworld? Ender would realize through the course of the simulations that nothing is really preparing him for defensive invasion scenarios since they are battling them at their colonies? Does that make sense?

        • Are you talking about Chamrajnagar’s line? The only explanation I have for that is they created non-movie footage just for the trailer. If you look at that scene where Chamrajnagar is talking, it’s the exact same still as the one we see of Graff. IMO it doesn’t even look real in the still, much less in the trailer. It’s as though it’s a picture with him talking in the middle. So while that line might be real, I’m not entirely convinced it’s in that setting in the film (him talking to Launchies).

          Your latter questions actually seem like valid book questions and I guess it’s explained by saying that these battles take place “in space” not necessarily near Earth, since clearly humans are not restricted to Earth in Ender’s world. I think Mazer explains the planet by saying that it was hypothetical? I’d have to go back to the book and look.

          • Ludwig Scroggins IV says:

            I have a hunch that they will establish, perhaps from the very first scene, that the bugger’s are preparing to invade us. We need to know the stakes from the very first, or we won’t understand or care about why Ender needs to struggle to become a great leader.

            And saying, “we’ve sent a fleet. It will get there some time in the next five years.” just doesn’t have the same urgency as “the buggers are coming!” And film needs urgency in a way books do not.

  2. Wendy Clare says:

    Superb article! I think you’ve very eloquently made the case for the film makers’ decision to let the audience “in” on The Truth. And you’re absolutely right about how that increases the importance of Graff & Mazer’s roles, both as characters and as actors. Well-done! 🙂 <

  3. AJM229 says:

    Perhaps the best article I have ever read on movies versus books. You really state clearly why support for the film doesn’t mean we have to clash with the love of the novel. If they make the film half as well as you have laid out how you think it should be made, it will be amazing. Thanks for making me think this evening!

    • Thanks for such an amazing compliment! I really do have high hopes now for the choice they made whereas before I was kind of on the fence!

      • AJM229 says:

        You’re welcome – thank YOU for writing the editorial. This is a great site; just discovered it today. I wish I had more friends I could nerd out with over great sci-fi literature such as Ender’s Game!

  4. […] Make sure you all read my latest editorial on why I think the audience knowing what’s going on will make a more powerful movie! I really […]

  5. Chuck Doofé says:

    I love your point about how critical Butterfield’s performance after the final battle is. For it to really be memorable, the audience needs to see Ender completely break down. I know in the book he just says nothing and walks through the crowd to his room and goes to sleep, but I think the film needs to show him cry out in anger and despair. It has the potential to be a real tearjerker.

    • MajorAnderson says:

      I totally agree, and I think Asa Butterfield has the ability to do it. In Hugo, he had some awesome tearjerker moments. I mean, with Hugo it was hit-and-miss. The scene where he flips about the robot not working was kind of overdone, but the one with the station inspector in the end was amazing. I think if they do this right, they’ll have one of the most touching scenes in YA movie history.

      • Wendy Clare says:

        I agree with you completely about Asa’s performance in Hugo–I was just rewatching that scene with the station master, and I was stunned by how completely believable his despair is. The more I see of the clips, and read the reviews praising his portrayal of Ender, the more confident I am that this will be THE breakout vehicle for Asa, far more than Hugo ever was. I couldn’t be more thrilled for him. 🙂 <

  6. […] Why the reveal will lend more power to the reveal with Ender after the final battle. Read my editorial mentioned on the podcast on EnderWiggin.net here. […]

  7. […] Why the reveal will lend more power to the reveal with Ender after the final battle. Read my editorial mentioned on the podcast on EnderWiggin.net here. […]

  8. […] way, and how that is actually probably a good thing (read Crystal’s editorial about that HERE) […]

  9. alrotundo says:

    It looks awful, just a shoot-em-up in space, with some “magic child” saving the day and Harrison Ford looking like an afterthought. Nothing to appeal to adults or women. I think this movie is going to BOMB big time..

    • Wendy Clare says:

      It’s rarely an accurate thing to “judge a movie by its trailer”…the vast majority of the reviews I’ve read/watched, often by people NOT familiar with the book, point to the emotional impact of Asa’s performance and to the surprisingly thoughtful/heavy/meaningful themes explored throughout the film. The footage of the trailers is meant to pique people’s interest…the “bait”, if you will. If /all/ they focused on were the ethical dilemmas, the general public would likely go “ho hum” and not see it at all. I wouldn’t jump to conclusions about this movie, if I were you. Give it a chance. 😉 <

      • Guest says:

        I agree. I’ve seen the movie, and the themes of the book are there. It’s a bit muted, but in comparison to recend SciFi blockbusters, this is a very intelligent movie. I think it’s also agreed on that the story of Ender is not the story of a “magic child saving the day.” The trailers could not tell you that without giving away the most profound scenes of the movie – so instead they try to appeal to general audiences and then shock those with unexpected debth. Believe me, it does appeal to adults more than any other scifi movie this summer did. As for the women: why would you say that? It’s generally a good story, so why should women not be nterested?

    • MajorAnderson says:

      I agree with Wendy. I’ve seen the movie, and it deals with some very important themes. Compared to the book it seems a bit muted, but in comparison to recent SciFi blockbusters, this is a very intelligent movie. I think it’s also agreed on that the story of Ender is not the story of a “magic child saving the day.” The trailers could not tell you that without giving away the most profound scenes of the movie – so instead they try to appeal to general audiences and then shock those with unexpected debth. Believe me, it does appeal to adults more than any other scifi movie this summer did. As for the women: why would you say that? It’s generally a good story, so why should women not be nterested?

  10. […] and promos and was eventually cut out to help preserve the twist. Be sure to read my editorial on why I thought that a spoiled twist would have made for a powerful movie […]

Leave a Comment »

Grab Ender's Game movie wallpapers >>
92 queries. 0.440 seconds. 28MB
Copyright © 2013